<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap Chicken: How Your Product Name Can Make or Break its Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redwrites.com/business-blogging/cheap-chicken-how-your-product-name-can-make-or-break-its-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redwrites.com/business-blogging/cheap-chicken-how-your-product-name-can-make-or-break-its-success/</link>
	<description>A Blog About... Nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.redwrites.com/business-blogging/cheap-chicken-how-your-product-name-can-make-or-break-its-success/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redwrites.com/?p=355#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I meant Marketing costs (not marking) in my earlier post, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant Marketing costs (not marking) in my earlier post, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.redwrites.com/business-blogging/cheap-chicken-how-your-product-name-can-make-or-break-its-success/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redwrites.com/?p=355#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Interesting exampels of real products with increased sales. 
Both &quot;Cheap Chicken&quot; and &quot;Friutcake&quot; are too generic which sound low quality and boring but praiseworthy. In these exampels is not good with generic names, because I want fresh and tasty chicken and I can pay an extra dollar for that. In other cases a generic name can make me buy just that product because I&#039;m looking for a simple, basic, cheap product and don&#039;t want to pay extra for the marking costs. I want &quot;Home Toilette Paper&quot; not &quot;Deluxe Wee-wee Serviettes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting exampels of real products with increased sales.<br />
Both &#8220;Cheap Chicken&#8221; and &#8220;Friutcake&#8221; are too generic which sound low quality and boring but praiseworthy. In these exampels is not good with generic names, because I want fresh and tasty chicken and I can pay an extra dollar for that. In other cases a generic name can make me buy just that product because I&#8217;m looking for a simple, basic, cheap product and don&#8217;t want to pay extra for the marking costs. I want &#8220;Home Toilette Paper&#8221; not &#8220;Deluxe Wee-wee Serviettes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

